Sunday, October 28, 2007

The FCC, Washington and Big Brother Communications Companies

WASHINGTON - Two Senators on Friday called for a congressional hearing to investigate reports that phone and cable companies are unfairly stifling communications over the Internet and on cell phones. Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, said the incidents involving several companies, including Comcast Corp., Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc., have raised serious concerns over the companies' "power to discriminate against content." They want the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee to investigate whether such incidents were based on legitimate business policies or unfair and anticompetitive practices and if more federal regulation is needed. "The phone and cable companies have previously stated that they would never use their market power to operate as content gatekeepers and have called efforts to put rules in place to protect consumers 'a solution in search of a problem,'" they said in a letter to Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, the committee's chairman. A committee spokeswoman declined to comment on the matter. An Associated Press report on Oct. 19 detailed how Comcast Corp. was interfering with file sharing by some of its Internet subscribers. The AP found instances in some areas of the country where traffic was blocked or delayed significantly. Comcast the nation's No. 2 Internet provider has acknowledged "delaying" some subscriber Internet data, but said the delays are temporary and intended to improve surfing for other users. Verizon Wireless in late September denied a request by Naral Pro-Choice America, an abortion rights group, to use its mobile network for a sign-up text messaging program. The company reversed course just a day later, calling it a mistake and an "isolated incident." AT&T reportedly changed a service agreement that previously included language permitting the company to cancel accounts of Internet users who disparage the company. Several lawmakers, including Dorgan, earlier this year introduced so-called legislation promoting "Net neutrality," which is the principle that all Internet traffic be treated equally by carriers. Equal treatment of traffic is long-standing practice on the Internet. The legislation is a response to suggestions by phone companies that they would like to charge Web sites extra for preferential treatment of their traffic. Verizon Wireless is a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. and Britain-based Vodafone Group PLC.

Here come the "Thought Police"

2 comments:

Riff said...

I have always known that FreeTeleConferencing is VERY private. Here is why: 1. You pick the time.
2. You have an individual number to call. 3. You have a private access code. 4. You regulate who has this info. And if you feel it is compromised YOU just get a new set of numbers! FOR FREE!
Think about it. What are the odds of someone stumbling into your teleconference? Which 10 digit number are they going to use? What 6 digit cod are they going to guess at? How are they going to know the time of the telecon? And just how are they going to log on with out YOU knowing since the conference announces ALL users and "role call" can be taken??? That is another reason Comcast, ATT, Sprint are so called service providers. They WANT to provide service for us poor slobs, in our best interest, as they see fit!

WHAT LAME JERKS... JUST HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE? I'm not some lamb being lead to slaughter.

I KNOW you people out there are not either.

Look for Spunky Bairnsdales blog she is a trip. She just want the idiots to go away...NOW!

Anonymous said...

Just what does ATT mean "disparage the company"? You mean if I tell the TRUTH and ATT is acting WRONG they can cancel my service??? I guess the contract is just like a marriage! I can't say anything TRUE about my ex wife either... IT IS ALL DISPARAGING!